Clarity
N/A
Engagement
N/A
Accessibility
N/A
Fairness
N/A
Difficulty
N/A
No ratings yet. Be the first to rate this professor!
From our previous platform (1997–2025). Current ratings include detailed course Intel.
This man doesn't deserve to be a professor. Reads bare act and then goes on to fail the entire class. Unjustly awards marks to people who are his pet and who wishes to take his coaching. Hope this man gets fired real soon ????
He is a terrible teacher. Never explains any concept, he only reads Bare Acts in class and that too with haste but, give application based questions in exams which are very tough to crack even for the brightest students of the class. He poorly checks answer sheets and deliberately tries to fail the students. He doesn't even behave properly with students.
Run like hell if this man ever becomes your teacher cause you're in for a nightmare if you don't
He deals with major procedural law subjects such as CPC and Evidence. Mere reading of the bare act with little to no productive explanation but actively gives application based questions in exam. Illegally runs a coaching in the campus itself and favours the enrolled students greatly. Actively takes pride in deliberately scoring less and failing students. Mostly unavailable after 10 or 11am depending upon his class schedule. If you want to actually study the subject, drop any hope of that happening under him, find alternatives. Just try and pass, if he fails you and you aren't one of his bootlikers, you will not be given any grace marks, opt for rechecking instead. Good luck dealing with this nightmare.